InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 19
Posts 218
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/06/2006

Re: MobyInvestor post# 26461

Thursday, 07/24/2008 6:53:30 PM

Thursday, July 24, 2008 6:53:30 PM

Post# of 346183
MOBY

You’re exposing your true colors. Your game is better than to fall back on obvious falsehoods like: “Peregrine doesn’t own their PS patents.”

Surely you know that PPHM’s exlusive world wide license is commercially the same thing as ownership.
_______________

“I find it hard to believe that they're going to let Duke have it all, lock, stock and barrel, without any of the fights and case law your friend revealed to you today.”

Apparently you need reading glasses. I said:

“It’s a common practice for the new patent filer [Duke] to agree to license the prior patent for a fair price [paid to PPHM]. In return, the owner of the prior patent [PPHM] agrees not to bring an “inherency” challenge against the new patent.”

Duke and PPHM are preparing for a commercial COLLABORATION, not a lawsuit. By the way, UTSW and Thorpe are huge beneficiaries of that collaboration.

Get it now.






Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CDMO News