Replies to post #26463 on Avid Bioservices Inc (CDMO)

[MobyInvestor]

"Surely you know that PPHM’s exlusive world wide license is commercially the same thing as ownership."

Thorpe and UTSW could give a rat's rearend about the commercial aspects of this. It's about immortality, up to and including the Nobel.

Why would either of them take a backseat to Haynes regarding the foundational research Thorpe did with PS?

Even if what you said is true regarding Thorpe not having fully developed the AV side of the PS story in his patents (which I'm struggling to believe) there's still the AC side and, as Jazz sufficiently put it:

"Evolution has favored pathogenesis that resembles apoptosis."

What could UTSW and Thorpe possibly gain in exchange for giving Hayne's the public nod on all things PS?

Regards,

moby

[volgoat]

“It’s a common practice for the new patent filer [Duke] to agree to license the prior patent for a fair price [paid to PPHM].


Is it Duke paying or CHAVI?


Is it Duke's patent or CHAVI's?...

CHAVI is a collaboration effort....If PPHM's anti PS is the centerpiece, better press than just Duke, especially when you throw the Gates Foundation in there....along with Duke of course.

PPHM has good friends this time....Playing ball with the govt and CHAVI....Duke/NIAID,DTRA,USAMRIID, etc, etc.....Could help with some important deals and decisions later on..