InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 1467
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/20/2007

Re: Big On Tarvy post# 26459

Thursday, 07/24/2008 6:32:03 PM

Thursday, July 24, 2008 6:32:03 PM

Post# of 346493
BOT,

I'm touched that you took the trouble to contact a patent lawyer over what I'd post here.

"You can bet PPHM is going to let Duke and Gates and NIAID have all the credit and fame and patents they want in exchange for collaborating with us and putting PPHM on the radar screen of every fund manager around the globe."

One problem. Peregrine doesn't own their PS patents, UTSW does.

So, I'm to believe that both the UTSW and Thorpe, the "father" of anti-PS technology are simply going to roll over for Peregrine'e benefit and allow Haynes to get all the credit for the foundational work that Thorpe did with PS?

I find it hard to believe that they're going to let Duke have it all, lock, stock and barrel, without any of the fights and case law your friend revealed to you today.

That is, of course, unless what Duke is working on is unrelated to Peregrine's patents. But, if that's the case, then how would this put Peregrine on the radar of every fund manager in the world?

Regards,

moby





Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CDMO News