In order to test the Vortex AIM we had some discussions on doing this recently. To arrange this informally will likely be to time consuming to do, and possibly the Yield/Effort Ratio will be low.
So, I propose a simple test:
I provide a simple "stock" history for 85 weeks and anyone can let his system take a go on it. I only have a few simple rules in order to be able to compare performance on the basis structure:
4) The cash reserve may not be negative at any time. How you prevent this is your choice...You could implement a Buy lower than the calculated Buy Order and than inhibit buys until there is again cash avaialable;
5 No Intermediate Parameter Tuning. That simply means that the Test AIM should not have auto-tuning features. For example, if you set out with a Buy/Sell Multiplier(Beta Factor as used by Automatic Investor) of 0,3 then this factor must remain 0,3 for the whole run of 85 weeks. Adjusting parameters in mid-stream is cheating...(for this test only!);
6 It is allowed to Optimize your AIM by trying out different parameter settings and to run the system as often as you like to get the maximum Return On Investment. This is not possible with real stocks, but this is a Model Test. It will provide a comparison for AIM System operation. It is clear that this optimization might result in inferior performance for a different share price history. That's OK. The idea here is that if you think that a Buy/Sell Multiplier of 0,6 is better than 0,3 then you run it again with 0,6. As simple as that.
The end run for de Vortex AIm resulted in a value of 25 343, or a yield 15,95 % on the 20 000 initial investment, using a 5% interest, compounded weekly.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.