InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 13
Posts 2463
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 02/23/2002

Re: Qarel post# 1410

Thursday, 03/07/2002 10:20:44 AM

Thursday, March 07, 2002 10:20:44 AM

Post# of 47154
Hi Karel,

Your point on the name pc[/b or sp is well taken: It does not matter what we call it. It does the job just the same. It is however important that in order to make judgements as to what it does we need to understand it function.

On your second point you might misunderstand the essence of that I wanted to demonstrate. The objective of the Vortex AIM is not to operate specifically such that it has any operating points in common with an Lichello AIM. The parameters must be set such as to creates optimum performance and that means that for each system you would ultimately end up with a unique set of parameters... this is obvious as the two systems have different parameters. If then there is, or is not, a point at which the Buy Order is identical for the two systmens is irrelevant. It is the profit that one can make, that is important.

The conclusions on the example was intended to show some fundamental difference in the cash disbeursement for the two systems. It means nothing else.

The negative aggression factor was simply a result of the particular comparison. With a positive aggression factor the Vortex AIM can of course buy as aggressively as you want.

Regards,
Conrad


Conrad Winkelman
What is Vortex AIMing? Look for my Vortex Discussion Forum:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=1341

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.