Hi Barry, I am running a little behind...(If you miss two days there 100+ messages to read)
I think smething isgone wrong in the text someplace. The idea tis this:
The Lichello Buy Advice =(pc-y) If the SAFE is(as a fraction) s then the BuySell Order is modified by a factor(1+s) and that can be a reduction or an increase(your choice, depending on how you define the SAFE). The point that you state pc-y*(1+s) makes no difference for it has the ultimate effect that it still produces a fractional change on the Buy/Sell Advice as pc-y*C1 = (pc-y)*C2. For any given C1 or C2 the other unkown will be found.
This is the conclusion: The form of the Lichello Buy/Sell Order is simply a linear proportion of the Buy/Sell Advice. Hence Lichello Order = (pc-y)*S and you can define the "S" from the SAFE any way you like. That being the case my conclusion was that the Vortex form of the Order was identical with F*(pc-y). The only difference in the use of my F*(pc-y) is that I calculate it from an aggression factor instead of from the SAFE. I use a Buy/Sell Resistance in the way Lichello uses the SAFE in order to revent buying or selling too soon. The use of F*(pc-y) simply allows me to make the Orders as big or as small as I want it, and buys and sells can obviously be made different as well.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.