InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,537.02
(
0.51%
)
US TECH 100
19,641.60
(
0.83%
)
Dow Jones
39,308.00
(
-0.06%
)
Brent Oil
86.74
(
-0.20%
)
Bitcoin
57,562.48
(
-4.33%
)
Post# of 10162
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

RebbePete

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 11
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/09/2007

RebbePete

Re: Yoe123 post# 6476

Thursday, 05/01/2008 2:59:56 PM

Thursday, May 01, 2008 2:59:56 PM

Post# of 10162
All the PRs that I've seen said they "controlled" the properties. Now they say they "own" the mineral rights. Probably they initially owned some interest in the land, but mineral rights are above and beyond the land ownership.

That immediately brings up two fascinating questions:

- Why buy the mineral rights if there's nothing there, particularly since they're always strapped for funds?
- Whom did they buy the rights from for the 1%/2% share?

For the first time in several years, I actually bought more stock in this dog today. Hopefully, I won't kick myself quite as hard as I have been over the initial purchase. Then again...

- Pete
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up