I only wrote in answer to "Is this correct and the way you asked seemed like you were confused as to why you got a negative #.
OK, I stand corrected. I did not check on which post# you were reacting to. On my latter posts I did the calculation with the absolute value symbols because I deducted that the first calculation was wrong.
In Vortex I do not use the absolute value formula as the (PC-SV) gives a negative answer for SV>PC so that this represents a sale and the trade is automatically deducted from the SV.
0.1* SV would be the SAFE ( Some people vary it like I posted in my last post)
OK, I was correct then that the AIM-practice nowadays is
AIM Trade = /(PC-SV)/ - a*SV
with a generally being selected independently from the SAFE %/100 so that there is control over the aggression of the AIM trading. Beautiful! Aim is beginning to look more and more like Vortex.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.