InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 13
Posts 2463
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 02/23/2002

Re: Toofuzzy post# 27321

Sunday, 04/27/2008 10:54:56 PM

Sunday, April 27, 2008 10:54:56 PM

Post# of 47148
Hi TooFuzzy,

I only wrote in answer to "Is this correct and the way you asked seemed like you were confused as to why you got a negative #.

OK, I stand corrected. I did not check on which post# you were reacting to. On my latter posts I did the calculation with the absolute value symbols because I deducted that the first calculation was wrong.

In Vortex I do not use the absolute value formula as the
(PC-SV) gives a negative answer for SV>PC so that this represents a sale and the trade is automatically deducted from the SV.

0.1* SV would be the SAFE ( Some people vary it like I posted in my last post)

OK, I was correct then that the AIM-practice nowadays is

AIM Trade = /(PC-SV)/ - a*SV

with a generally being selected independently from the SAFE %/100 so that there is control over the aggression of the AIM trading. Beautiful! Aim is beginning to look more and more like Vortex.

smile smile

Thanks for the clarification.

Conrad Winkelman
What is Vortex AIMing? Look for my Vortex Discussion Forum:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=1341

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.