InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 45
Posts 5991
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 04/23/2004

Re: rocketone1 post# 63521

Thursday, 01/17/2008 9:24:53 PM

Thursday, January 17, 2008 9:24:53 PM

Post# of 79921
rocketone1

The whole point was if they had the money to pay the divy, they were making money. So should I now assume they DON"T have the money to pay for additional converted shares if the offer still stood?

"The rest of your note complains about the company's past performance. Obviously, I agree they have done a lot of things wrong, but I don't see how that makes today's PR bad."

Wrong. The rest of the post states facts about what the company did and didn't do. I didn't make it up. And yes, I thought buying a stock WAS about performance. If not, who would but a stock for NON performance other than a shorter? I can tolerate positive posts just as well as negative. But please don't make the assumption that positive is pumping, and negative is bashing. In both cases, it's simply an opinion. If we weren't all in this mess together, we wouldn't be posting here.



Be happy while your living, for your a long time dead.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.