InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 1247
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/10/2000

Re: Linchuck post# 4015

Tuesday, 03/09/2004 12:39:11 PM

Tuesday, March 09, 2004 12:39:11 PM

Post# of 7045
chuck, I don't want to beat this subject to death, but I think you're comparing apples to oranges.

The people you were talking about are all connected with the company involved and usually hold positions of Management.
When it comes to criminal activity it's a very shady area.

In Martha's case, besides being a shareholder, she had nothing to do with the company she held stock in. She acted as a private investor who was illegally trading on insider information..............and she got caught.

re Nascar; OK, so there is no court order and legally, nothing has been done.(at least that's the way it sounds).
If a letter like that had been sent, it would have been from Nascar officials to the company officials and very few people would even know about it. It's beginning to look like another message-board fantasy post.

If true, all the company would have to do is put some sort of disclaimer on the product saying that it's not endorsed by Nascar. I see that sort of thing all the time.
But, true or not, it's hurting the PPS, for now, and a good short play opportunity may develop.


"Aim low Sheriff...They're ride'n snakes"
as usual...JMHO..SMD

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.