Thanks for the potentially "substance less" reply. It appears that you responded to your questions not mine, and may have "cherry picked".
1. No rant; just restating your posting or what seems to be the "line of thought".
2a. CO2: I asked you a question about it, but it must still be in your in-basket. No further discussion lately, except your statement in post #7192, the one that I am replying to or discussing.
2b. CO2: Tell your "shallow depth theory, which is INCORRECT, to the owner of one of the largest sources of CO2 and uses it in old abandoned shallow wells, they purchased. I know AS FACT they have employed the technology in MS, LA. and TX. They are making a lot of $ using it in OLD SHALLOW WELLS!!!! "Put that in your pipe and smoke it"
3. %S: Since you may have used some various #s at various times, I wanted to include what you may have used, or may not have used. I believe Lou said he used 65% as an example, BECAUSE it had been mentioned on this board. I believe he also said 75% was his #/ave.
4. Why not use Lou's #, or do you know more about BDGR than Lou?
5. Tell us more: I do not think I mentioned NRI, AND I HAVE NOT ASKED YOU about NRI; Thus, how could you have previously "told me"?
6. In-basket: you responded about one state (LA) on a compliance question posted by someone else. I ASKED YOU ABOUT THE OTHER 49 STATES, which may be in your in-basket. See CO2 question above for another example.
7. Birdman: Your response made me LAUGH! THANK YOU!!!
8. Easy questions/answer what you may want to regardless of the question: Examples may be: oil man question and business question. Hum, two examples in one post and you may not have an idea about what I may have been discussing. You even "cut and pasted" those two questions, but did not respond. Was it that you just missed them or did you??????
We all want transparency from BDGR, as well as, from shareholders or non-shareholders that post on this message board.
It just seems to me, there are a few posters on this board that may be less than transparent. Are you transparent, or not? I have stated that I was (Note: no grandfather clause accepted). IS THAT A FAIR QUESTION AND DOES IT DESERVE A GOOD REPLY?
There are several questions in this post and NO RANT.
Have a nice day
