"Please see and respond to Lou's Post which SEEMS TO BLOW HOLDS IN YOUR POST!!!!!"
I hadn't noticed. Can you frame your rant in the form of a question?
"Now you hold those figures (In Lou's response to the same message that I am responding to), or had you rather use the 65%, 50%, 19%, 10%, or whatever may be your "cup of tea". Why not use 100%, if you want to just put a figure out? What happened to the 62.5%?"
62.5% would be a good number too. The point is, whatever the number, that the NRI is important. That's been covered before, ad nauseum.
"Tell us more; "It will matter a LOT later on". Or had you rather play what may appear to be "I got a secret BS". You may seem to talk/post like that a LOT."
I've already told you but will tell you again. NRI affects not only current profitability but the ability farm out for further development by third parties.
"QUESTION!!!!!!! When are you going to respond to the easy, but what may seem to be hard questions. Your in-basket may be overflowing."
What are you referring to?
"Question: Are you really an oil person? Can you walk the walk? The CO2 question is still out there and the other 49 states are still out there, etc."
CO2 is not miscible at the pressures found at shallow depths. Therefore not applicable for most of their production. That's also been covered before.
"Question: Is there a business/potential business relationship between you the birdman. He has "spoon feed" a lot of questions to various posters on this board."
Spoon fed? I don't know any "birdman".
