presumption of innocence:
"obviously the Commission concluded that after conducting a four month long informal inquiry that there was enough substance to upgrade it to a formal investigation. whether Wave receives a "Wells notice" remains to be seen."
Snack, that IS a presumption of innocence.
moreover, i have posted repeatedly that IF Wave is fully exonerated the stock might be worth considering, but not while the investigation is pending. so, while wavoids are certain of innocence, i offer the presumption coupled w/the possibility of what might transpire if the presumption is rebutted by the SEC's findings.
this board is about the stock & the company & none of us are on a jury.
also, i don't always accuse anyone of circulating insider info... in fact, i merely cut & paste other posts that have the appearance of insider info.
BIG difference.
btw, Texastree - i'm doing just fine bud. thanks for the opinion, but if my posts were motivated by vengeance, i would use all 18 every day.
& given all the stuff that i could post about the failures & false promises & self interested actions & breaches of fiduciary duty & misleading rhetoric of this company over the years & all of the ridiculously incorrect predictions of world domination posted by wavoids, just be glad i'm not posting w/vengeance.
besides, i did really well trading wavx in 2003, why would i seek revenge?
& to whoever posted the public defender comment -- i'd be far more likely to work for the SEC prosecuting white collar securities crime than i would be to defend common criminals. thanks for the observation though!
anyway, let the hyping continue...
