InvestorsHub Logo

jai

Followers 14
Posts 897
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/05/2003

jai

Re: Corp_Buyer post# 49215

Wednesday, 11/19/2003 12:28:32 PM

Wednesday, November 19, 2003 12:28:32 PM

Post# of 432773
I'm probably a newbie (in for about 4 years) but in that time we have consistantly been hoping that Nokia set a rate. The arbitration move changed my thinking. First I was upset at the company for declaring Victory and cashing out. After I got over the large haircut my portfolio took that day (I was buying after the Ericson settlement) I began to understand what IDCC was up against.

For years I thought Microsoft would lose. I did my masters Thesis on AT&T Unix versus IBM/MSFT DOS. I saw UNIX as a superior product and DOS/Windows as buggy and troblesome.
My investment strategy was betting against MSFT with NOVL. I lost and NOVL/IBM/LOTUS..etc etc lost.

The companies that won worked with MSFT. They fought their way to becoming the 800 pound Gorilla in the PC world and INTEL road on MSFT back to become the powerhouse that it is today.

That being said I do not beleive we can get Nokia to agree to anything that they do not clearly see as in the best interest for Nokia. Right now they view royalty payments as unneccesary costs of doing business and would like nothing more than to eliminate them completely. With this mindset how can you explain to them that they should set a rate? They will save money? They are not paying anything now so they can't save anything.

Nokia would steamroll over IDCC if they could just the way MSFT steamrolled over DR-DOS (The original inventor of DOS). Unfortunately for Nokia IDCC decided to build a solid legal team to help them protect their IPR. The loss to Harris by Ericson showed the strenth of the F & J team.

IDCC is now viewed as a hemiroid on NOKIA's butt. They want to preparation H the situation and hope they just go away. MSFT was famous for using smaller companies technology then just stealing it, leaving the inventors holding the bag. After listening to some of the recent Nokia statements they would like to just use IPR and not pay for it.

So I see a very long draw out battle ahead in both 2G and 3G when it comes to NOKIA/SAM/ERIC/MOT. These guys all have the Gorilla mindset. IDCC needs to do what they are doing. Getting deals done with NEC/SHARP/SANYO/RIMM, companies that respect IPR and understand that working together can make them more profitable. Basically the only way I see the big guys paying is by force.


Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News