InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 48
Posts 3562
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 02/01/2019

Re: Valuator2 post# 197663

Monday, 04/29/2024 3:27:44 AM

Monday, April 29, 2024 3:27:44 AM

Post# of 198163
Valuator2,
My opinionated analysis is based on all the PR infomation (and/or lack of any opposing information) provided to ENZC shareholders so far and also was based on your post number 197524 in which you suspect that the control of ENZC was relinquished back to Harry under the 4-way agreement between Charles, Joes, Chandra and Harry.

Despite that the fact that Charles is lawyer, the party of four (Charles, Joes, Chandra and Harry) think that all of them can get away with doing the "bad" things because ENZC is an OTC stock which is not being subject to the SEC regulation enforcement, and also perhaps because they have not yet received any real legal challenges from any of its ENZC shareholders. They also know that ENZC shareholders do not have any voting rights to oppose any of their plans.

We recently know that Charles and Chandra have already detached themselves from ENZC and successfully founded their own new companies without telling ENZC shareholders and without any regards to the terms of the transaction with SAGA as they founded their own companies. Is it greed for is it because Charles is running out of time as his age is 80 year and he does not have much time left to do what he planned to set out to do.

p/s: I am responsible for drawing my personal opinion independently from Dyno89 whose posts I dont read and already ignored