InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 30
Posts 4127
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/25/2007

Re: mrwilson31 post# 6569

Saturday, 03/23/2024 1:42:21 PM

Saturday, March 23, 2024 1:42:21 PM

Post# of 7702

It’s going to be an uphill battle for sure. CD is a very small portion of a therapeutic market. They should have gone after the migraine market first.



The market for CD is certainly large enough to make a big difference in RVNC's fortunes and a longer lasting toxin will make a far bigger difference to those suffering from CD than for cosmetic purposes. That means uptake in CD should be much faster. I believe migraines would be a harder and more expensive indication for clinical trials. Whether or not they should have pursued that area instead of glabellar lines and CD or in addition to both is now a moot point. The market size for CD is shown below along with projections for future growth.

https://www.businessresearchinsights.com/market-reports/cervical-dystonia-therapeutics-market-103393


I am sure there will be off label use of the product. The hard part is where it falls on the insurance formularies.



Yes, there will be off-label usage in therapeutics.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent RVNC News