InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 54
Posts 1662
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/22/2022

Re: exwannabe post# 660289

Saturday, 12/30/2023 12:20:56 PM

Saturday, December 30, 2023 12:20:56 PM

Post# of 703918
ex,

Thanks for your analysis, but your reasoning is nonsensical overall. I had to consult the detector on this one 😶 …




“This statement's reasoning is weak and unreliable:

1. **Disclosure about MMTLP and Next Bridge**: The statement claims that it was well-disclosed that MMTLP holders would receive a dividend in shares of Next Bridge and that MMTLP shares would be cancelled. The reliability of this claim depends on the accuracy and clarity of the actual disclosures made by the companies involved. A citation is required.

2. **Comments on last-minute investors**: The statement criticizes those who invested in the last few days based on expectations of a short squeeze, labeling them as "fools." This is a subjective judgment and is not a statement of fact. Investment decisions can be influenced by various factors and the use of derogatory terms to describe investors is not a reasoned argument.

3. **Short position size and fails to deliver (FTD)**: The claim about the short position being small (1.2% of total shares) and the discussion on FTDs is factual in nature, but its accuracy hinges on the reliability of the data source (FINRA in this case). A data citation is required.

4. **Validity of the short squeeze theory**: The statement asserts that the idea of a distribution forcing shorts to cover is "nonsense" and often used by "BS pumpers." This is a generalization and may not hold true in all cases. The effectiveness of a short squeeze strategy can vary depending on specific market conditions and the stock in question. This part of the statement is conjecture.

5. **Outcome for late investors**: The claim that late investors received what they deserved (shares in Next Bridge) and that the value was known is again a mix of factual and subjective elements. Whether the value was "reasonably well known" is debatable and depends on the information available to investors at the time.

6. **Comment on trading halt and market operations**: The statement that a trading halt was justified due to the inability to settle trades after a certain date is a rational explanation of market mechanics. However, the tone used ("whining", "total failure to understand") is subjective and diminishes the objectivity of the argument.

In summary, the statement mixes factual information with subjective judgments and baseless generalizations. Some parts are based on data (e.g., short interest size), which lends them credibility if the data are accurate. However, the use of derogatory language and sweeping generalizations about investor behavior and market strategies undermines the overall reasoning and reliability of the statement. Biased and unsubstantiated opinions are interwoven throughout this statement rendering its argument unreliable.”


https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/northwest-biotherapeutics-announces-that-a-marketing-authorization-application-has-been-submitted-to-the-uk-mhra-for-dcvax-l-for-glioblastoma-302021038.html
Bullish
Bullish

Believe carefully. This is the greatest and most powerful lesson that I have learned since arriving on Earth. Examine what you believe about yourself most importantly, and then believe carefully as you interact with the world.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News