InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 90
Posts 17344
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/06/2006

Re: biosectinvestor post# 658826

Sunday, 12/24/2023 12:12:13 PM

Sunday, December 24, 2023 12:12:13 PM

Post# of 697101

I do recall one post with everyone listed and the exact terms laid out. I do not recall your disputing those terms at the time when it was all prominently displayed and longer were jumping in to make their bets too


Nice selective recall there biosec.

Reply to first of Hoffman's summaries.

My bet with you was for approval, not submission, in 2023. And the terms were a mea-culpa sig line.


The bet was made sometime late 2022. Over the course of the last 8 months since he unilaterally changed the terms I have called him out for lying on this about a dozen times.

Though the bet post was deleted, there are several posts where I am asserting no approval. And none where I asserted no submission.
Try this post:

Virtually a certainty there is no approval in 2023. Only real question is if they even submit in 2023.


And note hoffman's reply:

This tells me approvals are around the corner as last time it was no JA, ever!



12/22 I was expecting submission could be a year out, which put it Dec 2023 or later., and no chance for approval in 2024

There is no reason to assume NWBO will even be submitting a MAA/BLA in months. There is reason to assume it will be a year or more based on statements in their SEC documents about prerequisites.


Saying 2024 for approval is optimistic.


And on 12/30

For Q2, clearly can take those Q2 MAA/BLA approvals off the table. Will be skeptical about a submission in that timeframe.



Hoffman's alleged bet is inconsistent with all of my posts through late 2022. While the the bet on approval I assert I offered is consistent with all.

Why must longs try so hard to lie if they actually think they are clearly right?
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News