InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 450
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/16/2006

Re: tchauncy post# 3232

Friday, 02/23/2007 1:29:02 PM

Friday, February 23, 2007 1:29:02 PM

Post# of 45176
With a preface to all this, let me first state that we are in a debate here about who is the better scammer.

#20 PR(reliability on all these are questionable on both sides) OMOG acquired wells for notes and cash. No stock involved. This would indicate to me that the stock in question has nothing to do with this unless the notes were converted at another time. The question then becomes, if Barnett took control, did he not know or account for the assets he was taking control of. Was there signed agreements on control and on assets acquired? Do the notes still exist and are they being paid on by OMDA? If the court or anyone else is throwing out stock that by prior statements has nothing to do with the purchase of this property where is the connection, when unless you converted the notes into some stock, payment, or lack of payment on the notes would determine ownership. I do not believe your statemnt is correct on the Feb.7th PR. The statement is not about BDGR backing out of the properties, but eliminating any further payments on it to Lanza.