Lightwave Logic Inc (LWLG)

[Lightning_Rod]

TP:

So sorry TP ........ you in fact did not provide lead up facts for your concluding argument for the original discussion and admitted it right here:

and he [Lebby] arguably missed all but 2 2022 goals also but we don't know because he refused to account for them.

You admit that when you say "we don't know" .

But you concluded with

IMO the argument that he missed the 2022 goals is strong

. Based upon what? Upon things we don't know because he refused to account for them. These cannot be called lead up facts because "we don't know". They are inferences of yours!

Your conclusion :

you can argue for WHY something is true without 'knowing' that it is

based upon previously unknown things..... inferences.
You provided no lead up facts WHATSOEVER.

I rest my case. You indeed need to take a course on logic.

IQ Test:
Put the following in order: theory, fact, inference, hypothesis, empirical testing, verification, model, implications.

you can argue for WHY something is true without 'knowing' that it is

Arguably the most incomprehensible piece of logic every posted on a message board (based upon the original context in which it was given).

L_R