Yes, good point. One of the Co's I sold out on, used the PROVISIONAL PATENT to establish authenticity, but when it did not provide the proper results, they re-instituted the P-Patent a second time! That, and many other methods of Public manipulation, still have their long term holders locked-up in the Hangman's noose, where they cannot get out due to Promises and talk, Promises and talk! They have lost tons of $s, yet hope to recoup some of their 75% loses so far?
Then the product that they licensed through a University was cancelled due to time limitations & failure to succeed in commercializing it! Once the contract ran out, they immediately said that the product "Was theirs," reasons how unknown, when my suspicions rose to the high Heavens & finally opted out! Now, 5-6 years later------
So, as they told to untold thousands that the product is still under development, but through the expertise of a couple of Private Co's and University Science Departments, all that after saying the product was theirs, they keep convincing Investors that a new E.V. Battery, and Additive now in process, will see a huge success in the Electric world of the future! So now, Investors are super enthused when word came out that this new EV Battery & additive has a Patent Application in the process!
My conclusion, though I may be wrong in this case, most Penny CEOs are more gifted at talking than developing! Tough road for both sides yes, but we are the ones throwing in money to support Co's without anything other, often enough, than the words coming out of their mouths!
At least RGBP isn't in the practice of getting in one enterprise that fails, then immediately jump into another one just to keep the Investors in the fold? Like the jump into Marijuana when the Original product fails...IMO... GLTA...
