InvestorsHub Logo

pqr

Followers 32
Posts 1018
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/29/2020

pqr

Re: Locknload56 post# 494709

Wednesday, 07/13/2022 9:48:03 PM

Wednesday, July 13, 2022 9:48:03 PM

Post# of 693846
Lock and daniel: The time that has passed in waiting for an article is a sore point for many, me included. However you are leaving out a credible factoid when you argue that article could/should have been in the works and the delay is not excusable for that reason. (It is a fair inference that this is your ultimate criticism). Specifically, shortly after data lock the company announced TLD would be released “within weeks or months” (words to that effect - I don’t recall and the question is immaterial to my point). Quite clearly the company did not intend to publish. The statement is imo credible for a very likely true reason: the company did not announce TLD as predicted and thereby opened itself to strong criticism.

So by deduction I conclude that plans changed, and specifically, that the plan not to publish became a plan to publish. And, from this apparent change in plans, I conclude that a publication is highly likely to be positive since publication of poor/adverse results (as a general proposition) would not be a reason to delay TLD and incur shareholder wrath.

So I believe that these events ultimately bode well, although the longer the delay the increase in possibility of a different result/black swan/financing issues etc.

GLTL let’s get the damn show on the road!!
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News