InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 1528
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/15/2011

Re: Tibby post# 29515

Sunday, 06/19/2022 12:59:11 PM

Sunday, June 19, 2022 12:59:11 PM

Post# of 29980
4 1997 contracts are valid to Barrick Chile and me. That makes me owner of Mina Pascua Chile. LAMA us a bust a story of crime to de permit Pascua from Argentina's minerals barren - burro pastures to date.

Under Chilean law the contracts are valid or SIMULATIONS. The later gives them 5 years per count (and property) ouch.

The 4 contracts gave life to the Magistrate's 2006 decision that I was the owner - he with nest rights - reconstitute AMARILLOS SUR and AMARILLOS NORTE as done by me.

Local regulators and Barrick - SLW attacked MR and MSX it was easier. Con deception of their shareholders was better.

I have given the ARREST WARRANT to local regulators and RCMP-IMET whom can pass and be part of it or act as required for Canada.

The local regulator's lawyer in the FACTUM to BC Court of Appeals wrote = MSX is in areas owned by Barrick. Now he has to show Barrick's 2012-2015 titles or be jailed with all his team of psychopaths/

He also lied that O $$$$$ A has over 100 mining related trials at Supreme Court and Appeals. Show 99 or be jailed as a gang. No more rope left for the criminals.

I am NOT the poor MSX et al or poor MWR et al. I am the rightful owner of the perfect MINA PASCUA areas titles 1996-2022. Ontario and local regulators HAVE NO TITLE for the NI 43101 of Barrick and SILVER WHEATON they have one way jail tickets only.

Inviting MWR and MSX shareholders to make criminal charges as applicable and ask for your money with interest.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.