Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[alm2]

Marjac
The cropping of the table
If the full table was not a document actually considered in the trial- although the K study was considered and debated by the expert witnesses- the introduction of the cropped table is even more dishonest and calculating - because what that does is it gives the impression that this was “the table “in K from the exhibit that was never seen in evidence in the case )

If the full table had been physically considered by the court in evidence then (whilst it might not have been an immediate and glaring difference ( as between the full table and the cropped one ) it might just have been more possible that someone might have identified that the table used by the generic post trial statement of facts was not the full one

The generics must have thought “let’s crop this table let’s slip this in because no one in this trial has seen the full table in the trail and neither Amarin s lawyers and most certainly not the judge will think to actually look for find and read the K study table to cross compare the real table to the cropped one we are popping in “

Bingo - we change the truth snd no one will spot it

Alm