InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 64
Posts 2029
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/31/2017

Re: iwasadiver post# 432032

Wednesday, 01/05/2022 8:05:47 AM

Wednesday, January 05, 2022 8:05:47 AM

Post# of 704176
When comparing Mar 2017 KM curves to Nov 2018, you can clearly see that the difference between those two curves starts around 2 years and continues growing through 3 years. I assume that separation continues growing until leveling off around 4.5 years.

Because the last 32 patients went on drug, and placebos all likely crossed over after the Aug 2015 halt in placebo meaning the last 3 months of enrolled placebo probably crossed over to DCVax before progression, the people marching from 1.5 to 3 years in 2017 to 2018 were highly enriched with DCVax. This is supported by the 85% treated number growing to over 90% in this time frame. This means that there is a high probability that the difference seen year 2 to year 3 is attributed to this enrichment at enrollment and over the past few months of non progressors.

What was the Intent To Treat those that crossed before progression and which arm do you place them in when analyzing the original cohorts if at all?

It wasn’t a mistake that switched their spots, it was the intent to move them to the treatment group. Those are questions regulators probably debated.

The original data set may be 232 vs 79 or even possibly but not likely 252 vs 79.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News