InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,572.85
(
0.10%
)
US TECH 100
19,951.20
(
0.53%
)
Dow Jones
39,344.79
(
-0.08%
)
Brent Oil
85.26
(
-0.19%
)
Bitcoin
57,159.86
(
0.80%
)
Post# of 96905
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

VC3

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 11
Posts 852
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/13/2018

VC3

Re: papa p post# 92201

Friday, 10/15/2021 12:07:40 AM

Friday, October 15, 2021 12:07:40 AM

Post# of 96905
The lawyers likely knew, unofficially, what Billy is and what he was up to - but since they didn't officially know, they have plausible deniability. One would think that an attorney, being an officer of the court, would be ethically and legally obligated to inform the court of malfeasance they became aware of - wouldn't they? Otherwise, wouldn't they be an accessory after the fact?
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up