Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[alm2]

Marjac

More

“The entire litigation came and went beforeEpadi saw fit to file to intervene”

The defendants endeavour to confuse the court into considering that the very beginning of the litigation (5 years ago) is the date set against which the timely nature of Epadi action should be judged
There are three crucial moments in time which working in conjunction with each other set the time points against which this issue can be judged
1-the date of the introduction into the proceedings of the cropped K table i
2-the date upon which analysis of the Mori statical calculations revealed that such were fatally flawed
3- the date of the passing of the deadline placed upon A by an Epadi party for A to bring Rule 60 proceedings

The dates are as follows

List

It is only against a consideration of these dates that whether Epadi brought a timely action can be judged- on any view Epadi acted with the utmost expedition in bring this case

Alm
More to follow