InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 42
Posts 1152
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/24/2021

Re: Flicker1 post# 126296

Saturday, 09/04/2021 7:17:51 PM

Saturday, September 04, 2021 7:17:51 PM

Post# of 198945
Gotcha. If Harry is in control of the patents, it doesn't matter what Savov says or if he got scammed.

Do we know for certain Harry is in control of the patents, free and clear? ENZC and Harry can (do?) both make that claim, but are there official documents that say otherwise?

Harry's name and The Zhabilov Trust are on this patent: https://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.htm&r=8&f=G&l=50&d=PTXT&p=1&S1=7479538&OS=7479538&RS=7479538

Savov is listed with IMMB "Officers, Directors, and Control Persons" in this document http://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/165977/content

If IMMB BG "owned" the patents, wouldn't it be required that all controlling parties agree to sell/transfer/sublicense and not just Harry?

I'll keep digging!