InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 64
Posts 6479
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/17/2017

Re: CherryTree1 post# 399811

Saturday, 09/04/2021 9:57:29 AM

Saturday, September 04, 2021 9:57:29 AM

Post# of 693749
The subject is why do we see overlapping patents from Northwest.
There could be different reasons for this. One is what I described Northwest wants to increase the probability of being accepted in one go, so as not to have to file subsequently improved patent descriptions after being rejected for one and the same invention. And in this case, enhancing the probability of being subjected to the odious operations of patent troll companies as in how I described it.

Another reason is to examine if Northwest is patenting more ways to get to Rome as they say, let's see what Flipper finds out. I don't see Northwest not completely patenting every aspect of the process, for as much as it can be patented, and accidentally forgetting a part of it and then later being confronted with other patent owners' claims.

Now as for you describing the invention and consequently patents of the carbonator, as if Im a 12-year-old but that's ok, I can 100% guarantee you that in the near future there will be, or already are, new methods for producing cancer antigen sensitized dendritic cells patented, which is only a good thing. I'm happy that DCVAX will be made completely obsolete by a better method in 10-15 years? However, that new invention will have to go through the same approval and prove better results first than L. In other words, it's not as if a newly submitted and approved patent in this area would immediately kill the DCVAX platform.

So a new improved patented method close home to producing cancer antigen sensitized dendritic cells but not infringing DCVAX will, regardless of what you are saying, NOT get NWBO in any sort of royalties/financial/obstruction trouble.


Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News