InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 64
Posts 6479
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/17/2017

Re: exwannabe post# 399147

Tuesday, 08/31/2021 3:12:41 PM

Tuesday, August 31, 2021 3:12:41 PM

Post# of 721461
then prove to me that he DID get options and warrants. NWBO never disclosed that he got any which they did for every other staff member. So share the link where I can deduct/conclude that indeed Duffy did get warrants and or options. You claim that he did have options/warrants where is your proof to that? Crickets


That he could have been hired if he did not have the options does not imply he could not hired if he did have options.



You twist what I and PM are saying.

Our thesis is this
PM assumption is as is mine that Duffy did not get warrants/options there is no proof that he did, LP gives away warrants/options like candy THUS it may very well indicate that Merck is interested in acquiring NWBO and has some sort of first option to do so (upon results) in exchange of delivering Duffy. Duffy can in that case not accept options/warrants, again read PM's post.

No this thesis will not hold up in court as waterproof evidence, it's board talk and holds merit. I never said it's evidence.

Are you deliberately changing what is being discussed here to show that a thesis is not 100% proof? Tbh you are the last to assert that a thesis is not evidence you do it all the time.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News