I may be wrong
but it seems that SLJB has been used publicly
as an example of what can happen to a company
when targeted by naked shorters. I believe it
was the CEO of Overstock that made the presentation.
I believe I posted the link some time ago to it.
I may have the symbol wrong.
Pinks are fun plays for me and don't get much of my time.
But if I have it correct, then the entire pump and dump
scenario given here would be incorrect.
The 995ad.com comments are correct from my own experience
as far as the site having little or worth.
Now that the shorted positions appear covered, it seems
very likely that those involved at some level with
naked short positions would have a lot to lose and thus
a flurry of diatribes concerning IDWD would ensue.
I too am highly suspect of these sudden positive posts
just as I suspect the veracity of negative ones.
In their favor, most of the negative posts are concerned
with posting facts, except most of the facts posted are
concerned with very very old info which ultimately gets
dismissed by most.
IDWD's problem is that there simply hasn't been anything
released in PRs recently which confirms or denies any
position, be it pro or con.
It's all speculation pretty much at this point either way.
If I was new to IDWD, I would shy away from investing in it.
Since I've been a long for some time, it's worth it to me
to see how it plays out. I'm just satisfying my own curiousity
at this point. My costs were covered early on.
I just want to see where this ends as it now appears in Limbo.
IDWD has been in Limbo for some time now, imo.
Will IDWD disappear?
Will it pay off?
Imo, the distribution of odds are about 50/50
inspite of all the noise either way.
My opinion is just that, my opinion.
So make no investment decisions based on my opinion.
#board-9931
