crtg. As much as the Crtg people want to push their programs through, this is a new product, whoever they manufacturer might be, and new products have to prove their worth, with both in-house testing and testing on the road, for months and Months and Months?! It is not so easy to say: "This product will enhance storage capacity from 3-400 %, so we must take a chance and implement the stuff in at least one of our products?" A mistake would lead to many complaints, and possibly lose the confidence of many of those already Invested in the Co'?
That could be one of the many reasons why Kraft couldn't make good on the commercialization of the CHS stuff when associated with NDSU? It takes time and Money and CRTG surely did not have the money and/or the Contractual time with NDSU, that was running out too?
It is a tragedy that things take so long, but before any Co' uses the stuff, they have to be very sure that it will work as advertised, and you know how advertising goes? Then, there is the question whether any of those early customers will again work with CRTG because of the supposedly negative experiences they had the first time around? And you can be sure that Kraft, the barrel of wisdom he is, contracted big Co's to deal with? Most of them are bound to say: "Call us in a month or two so we can talk it over with staff?" Crtg will still be trying to crawl themselves out of the hole they dug 5-6 years ago?
CHS is a great product, now being advertised at 200% increase in storage capacity, but management still is a BIG question to me no matter how much they say these days? Management is usually ill-equipped mentally and Monetarily to meet the challenges in the Penny Stock area? I have seen it, especially when so many promises are made, yet nothing has materialized as far as implementation goes! If it was so easy, CRTG would have started receiving revenues by this time? It is tough, but Kraft seems to have the toughness and passion to make it, but signs of it aren't enough, especially after one FAILURE has occurred? One would think that Kraft and Co' learned something after that failure, but have they gone up the wrong tree with their new proposals, who knows? First of all, they were ill-equipped the first time around, so will it be the same now? I hope Kraft makes the turn-around, for it would then show that there is hope in the P-Stock field! So many good things have to come together synergistically however, and that is hard to achieve IMHO? Good Luck to Kraft and the Long Time investors too!!!
But if one does not look at the negatives, even if it may be a frightful experience, then She/He doesn't belong in this field! We are all filled with hopes, but those far too "High Up in the Clouds hopes," have to temper their thoughts with as much important facts as they can gather by strong professional Analytics, and that can be achieved when viewing the posts, and seeing how far they came in their promises! Talk about new Customers or Partnerships is only talk unless something moves forward in those areas! It shouldn't take 2 or more years for something to materialize? One has to find Co's that have definite ways already in process to start seeing revenue, not a situation where they are not even mentioned in their PRs!! Better to be thorough than hopeful! If revenue is years away from materializing, then start thinking instead of seeking more PRs to satisfy your decision to hold?
I've made a few adjustments in my time, and it finally is paying off to some degree, but that is tenuous to be sure!! Buying 10 Mil' shares when prices were in the triple .000s makes more sense than buying in the teens, where nothing in the forseeable future makes the Co' look prosperous? Many of us are trapped-in to depending on PRs to make our decisions for us? You must believe that everything a Co' says is to their benefit, not yours? Gaining more Investors is usually the plan they have? IMO
