InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 810
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/13/2005

Re: JoshTaeger post# 47591

Saturday, 02/06/2021 7:22:13 PM

Saturday, February 06, 2021 7:22:13 PM

Post# of 50023
Since the contract is the binding rule, statutory limits are not generally applied in most cases.

If statutory limits were to be in place I believe the judge would have mentioned that and the statutory local rule by which he would make such ruling. Instead he cited the contract language.

The contract reads “all litigation expenses”

If not for the litigation is there an expense of the 27.5%??

Certainly the judge could deem such as excessive and reduce it but as you said that would be another litigation or issue that Rontan would have to raise.

So far, Rontan has enough trouble just showing up to or following the direction of the court.

Maybe they succeed in having this reduced. Idk. But it is specifically spelled out and directly referenced in the judges final order.