Saturday, February 06, 2021 7:22:13 PM
If statutory limits were to be in place I believe the judge would have mentioned that and the statutory local rule by which he would make such ruling. Instead he cited the contract language.
The contract reads “all litigation expenses”
If not for the litigation is there an expense of the 27.5%??
Certainly the judge could deem such as excessive and reduce it but as you said that would be another litigation or issue that Rontan would have to raise.
So far, Rontan has enough trouble just showing up to or following the direction of the court.
Maybe they succeed in having this reduced. Idk. But it is specifically spelled out and directly referenced in the judges final order.
Greenlite Ventures Inks Deal to Acquire No Limit Technology • GRNL • May 17, 2024 3:00 PM
Music Licensing, Inc. (OTC: SONG) Subsidiary Pro Music Rights Secures Final Judgment of $114,081.30 USD, Demonstrating Strength of Licensing Agreements • SONGD • May 17, 2024 11:00 AM
VPR Brands (VPRB) Reports First Quarter 2024 Financial Results • VPRB • May 17, 2024 8:04 AM
ILUS Provides a First Quarter Filing Update • ILUS • May 16, 2024 11:26 AM
Cannabix Technologies and Omega Laboratories Inc. enter Strategic Partnership to Commercialize Marijuana Breathalyzer Technology • BLO • May 16, 2024 8:13 AM
Avant Technologies to Revolutionize Data Center Management with Proprietary AI Software Platform • AVAI • May 16, 2024 8:00 AM