InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 13
Posts 2463
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 02/23/2002

Re: Qarel post# 10137

Monday, 10/20/2003 12:21:23 PM

Monday, October 20, 2003 12:21:23 PM

Post# of 47266
OK, Qarel,

I agree with what you are pointing out on my Point # 1 in the previous message:

. . .Lichello Method leans towards cashing-out rather than. . .

In this I just mean to suggest that I thought Lichellos's Method had some more tendency to cashing-out profits than I thought it did, from previous information. I was just a little surprised that the TWROI ended up negative.

In afterthought, considering a long run in which there is a slight excess of profit-reaping relative to profit re-investing, it is easy to see that eventually the TWROI becomes negative.

With the Vortex method it is easy to adjust the Buy/Sell ratio just the other way around, and then the TWROI will remain positive with the given price cycling.

This name TWROI does not roll easily from the tongue. I got to figure out a better name!

ROAI ? No!
AIY ? No!
ROITBI ? No!
ROIAR ? No!
POWER ? smile

Portfolio Optimization With Exterminated Risk ? No! This sounds phony, and pretentious. Any way, I had reserved POWER for some other Vortex variant:

Portfolio Optimization With Equity Rotation

smile

Regards,




Conrad Winkelman
What is Vortex AIMing? Look for my Vortex Discussion Forum:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=1341

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.