Followers | 312 |
Posts | 51806 |
Boards Moderated | 15 |
Alias Born | 08/19/2009 |
Wednesday, December 30, 2020 11:30:37 AM
The reason that this is an ongoing case is because 100% of prior cases where companies failed to file (as DBMM did) they were revoked.
Now either the sentence was wrong for many of the prior cases, or the sentence was wrong this time...
And for the record, I do not believe that revocation is appropriate here!
That said, history (all prior cases) show that the SEC believes that revocation is appropriate here! It is not hard to believe that they will find for that again here!
Hence why this has been ongoing for over a year!
Recent DBMM News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/16/2024 09:32:32 PM
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/29/2023 09:31:08 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/17/2023 09:15:45 PM
FEATURED POET Wins "Best Optical AI Solution" in 2024 AI Breakthrough Awards Program • Jun 26, 2024 10:09 AM
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Flotation Cell Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. and Hemp Emu Announce Strategic Partnership to Enhance CBD Product Manufacturing • BLEG • Jun 27, 2024 8:30 AM
HealthLynked Promotes Bill Crupi to Chief Operating Officer • HLYK • Jun 26, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Short Term Department of Defense Contract Wins Will Exceed $1,100,000 for the current Quarter • BANT • Jun 25, 2024 10:00 AM