NanoTech Gaming Inc (NTGL)

[Zorax]

Which brings to question how any custo play for n-t-gl makes sense.
Numerous people have stated, and I agreed with them that a party could not acquire a defunct and litigated company. But since the SEC basically removed the two companies themselves from one of the lawsuits, perhaps that cleared the way.
And those knowledgeable people no longer post to this board.

But dixon is known for frivolous custo plays and drops the ticker later. He may have one or two he's kept. But all his custo's are with bad actors and dead companies. And always the custo's he starts he own stock in and theirs a profitable pop in the pps.

At the time dixon had sold off some of his original shares in nt-g-l, but now I believe he may have gotten lots more in a off market personal sale from the principal in earlier deals before the custo, or while he and the principal were hatching the custo play plans.

It's clearly a pure stock play. Almost all of them are.