Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[alm2]

Marjac-I stayed away from reading the board for a month -so I have missed the party -sorry this not to have contributed financially if nothing else -awesome job you and the team-getting it in quick was absolutely right approach-he who hesitates...we discussed time back that litigating the f...out of the generics is the way..delay delay delay...the amicus serves purpose-both to support and add dimension to the singer en blanc but also sends shot across the bows to generics that this litigation has way to go and yet in different directions of travel.. the TEVA case was the gift from heaven as to decision and timing - from one lawyer to another -admiration -Hikma and their expert are now stuck between a rock and a hard place ....how do they answer to the Amicus assertion of fraudulently / deliberately misleading the court -evidence on oath -was it truthful?-was it deliberately misleading the court - both expert and the Hikma lawyers have a duty to the court...was the cropping of K tables deliberate and thus fraudulent ... was it intentional but this the court was nonetheless misled
Hard to see that Hikma and expert can ignore these assertions
Silence - an acceptance of the facts and an exercise of right to not self incriminate ??
Or respond - denying what exactly ? ...
they have to respond - the court can not simply ignore these assertions without asking Hikma / expert to reply to these assertions
That is not the same issue as to whether the FC allows / denies the en banc ...
The FC has no choice in the face of such grave allegations but to invite and consider Hikma/ expert response before deciding en banc
It may be that in the light of the response the FC will refer the assertions for investigation by the professional bodies of both the Hikma lawyers and expert /professional body and even further to criminal investigative authority if perjury and perverting the course of justice are considered in issue

Indeed further it would be entirely appropriate for Amarin shareholders to report Hikma lawyers and expert to their professional bodies and criminal investigative authority
(As you know I am UK lawyer so not au fait with names of the professional bodies concerned)

Nothing worse for lawyers and experts to have professional disciplinary investigation / criminal investigation

Huge can of worms unlocked here -

Mori - is it not possible ?? Time permitting and from another Shareholder group ? For a further Amicus to be lodged - is it not right that the FC is formally made aware that the statistical basis behind the Mori conclusion was fatally flawed and the D.C. should actually of its own volition in the light of same have reviewed its own decision Du failure to do so a matter which should be highlighted in such secondary Amicus
Alm