![](https://investorshub.advfn.com/uicon/564105.png?cb=1547105359)
Saturday, September 12, 2020 6:48:27 PM
But if they don't, they are at risk of having to compete with the technology that they will be offering. Same tech, two companies (maybe three) offering it, means price wars, low profits, hence absolutely foolish business move to allow the possibility. Whether they would be competing against Titan or against whoever subsequently might buy Titan, they could be forfeiting half to two thirds of their potential market share. Is there a logical argument to support this possibility? Or does it seem more feasible for them to plunk down a couple or few billion up front to be the sole viable competitor for ISRG? Feel free to put some ballpark numbers around any such supposition and a clear pathway should emerge.
Feel free to share your numbers here!
Just something for the doubters to consider.
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Flotation Cell Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. and Hemp Emu Announce Strategic Partnership to Enhance CBD Product Manufacturing • BLEG • Jun 27, 2024 8:30 AM
POET Wins "Best Optical AI Solution" in 2024 AI Breakthrough Awards Program • POET • Jun 26, 2024 10:09 AM
HealthLynked Promotes Bill Crupi to Chief Operating Officer • HLYK • Jun 26, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Short Term Department of Defense Contract Wins Will Exceed $1,100,000 for the current Quarter • BANT • Jun 25, 2024 10:00 AM