![](https://investorshub.advfn.com/uicon/564105.png?cb=1547105359)
Saturday, September 12, 2020 6:48:27 PM
But if they don't, they are at risk of having to compete with the technology that they will be offering. Same tech, two companies (maybe three) offering it, means price wars, low profits, hence absolutely foolish business move to allow the possibility. Whether they would be competing against Titan or against whoever subsequently might buy Titan, they could be forfeiting half to two thirds of their potential market share. Is there a logical argument to support this possibility? Or does it seem more feasible for them to plunk down a couple or few billion up front to be the sole viable competitor for ISRG? Feel free to put some ballpark numbers around any such supposition and a clear pathway should emerge.
Feel free to share your numbers here!
Just something for the doubters to consider.
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM
ATWEC Announces Major Acquisition and Lays Out Strategic Growth Plans • ATWT • Jun 20, 2024 7:09 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc Announces Acquisition of Drago Knives, LLC • CAFI • Jun 18, 2024 8:45 AM
Hydromer Announces Attainment of ISO 13485 Certification • HYDI • Jun 17, 2024 9:22 AM