InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 356
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/18/2013

Re: jomama9231 post# 275858

Sunday, 05/24/2020 1:54:28 AM

Sunday, May 24, 2020 1:54:28 AM

Post# of 424011
jomama9231-

I was hoping you would get a rebuttal to your point (below) to put me at ease

"To your point 2 I am still not at ease. It was turned down but when the patent examiner overcame it they clearly wrote that they only overcame it bc of ApO-B. I went back and read it all. Therefore I don’t know that the point singer makes is a valid point, but I defer to the lawyers or someone more knowledgeable than me. It seems if they turned it down and later accepted it in full it would have more weight but bc they still found it obvious to reduce TG and not raise LDL it’s tough (for me) to get past that point."
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News