jomama9231 Saturday, 05/23/20 03:23:27 PM Re: ziploc_1 post# 275836 Post # of 277701 To your point 2 I am still not at ease. It was turned down but when the patent examiner overcame it they clearly wrote that they only overcame it bc of ApO-B. I went back and read it all. Therefore I don’t know that the point singer makes is a valid point, but I defer to the lawyers or someone more knowledgeable than me. It seems if they turned it down and later accepted it in full it would have more weight but bc they still found it obvious to reduce TG and not raise LDL it’s tough (for me) to get past that point.