InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 62
Posts 7505
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: marjac post# 275796

Saturday, 05/23/2020 1:58:27 PM

Saturday, May 23, 2020 1:58:27 PM

Post# of 424162
Judge Du's thought processes throughout the trial may have gone through several steps...WHICH WERE MOSTLY IN ERROR!
1.QUOTE from Marjac's post(#275836)..."If in her mind, it is not distinctive/different, but rather, nothing more than fish oil, as her comment would seem to indicate, then it is obvious and not worthy of patent protection."
2. The PTO turned the patent down before approving it...RIGHT(but the PTO turns down many patents before approving them)
3. The PTO approved it without even considering MORI and KURA...WRONG
4. Mori showed prior art...WRONG
5. Kuri showed prior art...WRONG
6. there was not much commercial success...WRONG
7.there was no long felt need...WRONG
8. there are already loads of fish oils on the the market...RIGHT
9. Therefore, why should this fish oil(Vascepa) have patent protection...WRONG
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News