InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 45
Posts 5645
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/05/2015

Re: Leprecon7777 post# 277674

Thursday, 04/16/2020 4:31:21 PM

Thursday, April 16, 2020 4:31:21 PM

Post# of 701936
Yes there was just a modest improvement in OS36 between JTM and SNO.
But the Top 100 median increased very markedly.
JTM was 40.4 months (CI 35.5-46.5)
SNO was 58.4 months (CI 45.9-94.5)

So the projected median went into almost an entirely different CI range. Highly statistically improbable, and can only have been caused by a long tail who just kept surviving, beyond previous expectations and KM projections. I think it is perfectly reasonable to make a supposition that if the projected Top 100 median had been calculated again, a year after SNO, it would be higher again than 58.4%.
On the basis of conditional survival expectations, it's implausible to me that these 50-60 long term survivors who surpassed statistical expectations between JTM and SNO, would then start suddenly falling short of expectations.

FWIW, my blended OS60 still hovers around 20-21%.

Some time back, LG gave a reason why they didn't want to give out a 'subjects still alive' figure. He suggested that they might be accused of cherrypicking, if they did.

That is, of course, debatable, and some would say it's not a valid justification for withholding numbers still alive.

Again, fwiw, my current survivors figure would be just below meirluc's, but quite a bit above Ex's.
Maybe 38-45 range.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News