Followers | 71 |
Posts | 1840 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 03/10/2017 |
![](https://investorshub.advfn.com/uicon/602969.png?cb=1489406016)
Tuesday, April 07, 2020 12:17:04 PM
You are somewhat correct regarding "opening up the door" to addition litigation, if it was a common situation. I do not believe what happened with DBMM is a first time situation. Certainly the circumstances have arisen before. Most likely though the principals involved simply did not fight it. In addition, it probably is a rare occurrence as well.
SEC is not going to be concerned with this happening repeatedly and if there were a presedent than a rule may come of it but doubtful.
It is still a fact 99% of companies revoked, regardless of why, are no longer viable concerns. So if you're the SEC, you don't waste resources on little stuff like this.
Recent DBMM News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/16/2024 09:32:32 PM
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/29/2023 09:31:08 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/17/2023 09:15:45 PM
FEATURED POET Wins "Best Optical AI Solution" in 2024 AI Breakthrough Awards Program • Jun 26, 2024 10:09 AM
HealthLynked Promotes Bill Crupi to Chief Operating Officer • HLYK • Jun 26, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Short Term Department of Defense Contract Wins Will Exceed $1,100,000 for the current Quarter • BANT • Jun 25, 2024 10:00 AM
ECGI Holdings Targets $9.7 Billion Equestrian Apparel Market with Allon Brand Launch • ECGI • Jun 25, 2024 8:36 AM
Avant Technologies Addresses Progress on AI Supercomputer-Driven Data Centers • AVAI • Jun 25, 2024 8:00 AM
Green Leaf Innovations, Inc. Expands International Presence with New Partnership in Dubai • GRLF • Jun 24, 2024 8:30 AM