InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 434
Posts 57599
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 01/09/2007

Re: JBIIRULES post# 306205

Saturday, 02/08/2020 12:00:24 PM

Saturday, February 08, 2020 12:00:24 PM

Post# of 312016
this scenario may be helpful in understanding why Non Retail (NR)
embedded for over a decade in PTOI (stock) .. has angst
with P2O's (company) ability to execute

first unlike many OTC targets (OTC is totally fungible)
P2O's founder originally accessed non toxic capital
to fund something many of us still deem jaw dropping
.. table top to Flagship in mere years .. this is significant
(far more so today than even 6 years or so ago)

it's why noting actual shareholder certs (449) vs the 1 held
via a CE .. aka colluding entities (DTC) .. matters ..
more on those CEs in a bit

the one and only time access to toxic capital came to
pass (aromatics) .. all with interest saw how their efforts'
played out .. shorting against their own certs .. seemingly
deliberate sabotage @ NF and padding certain like minded
entities' pockets over and over again

P2O was wrested back in mid August 2013 .. the newly installed
CEO infused Multiple Millions on 9.30.13 .. NRs' response to
that .. relentlessly compressing PTOI (stock) from 35c (9.30.13)
to 10c on 12.31.13

This is NRs' MO .. it is a very specific playbook Non Retail follows

in approximate order ..

NR works OTC target for cycles of money .. UP & DOWN
NR eventually goes UPSIDE DOWN
NR sanctions hit pieces .. usually in alignment with the
importation of a new *MM* (Market maker/market manipulator) to aid/abet (resetting)
Atty Firms' on hedgies' speed dial start trawling/trolling for *retail* lead plaintiff


and when that didn't *part* actual investors from their *shares* ..
NR works CONnections .. but to do that .. NR has to *expend effort*
that is what April 2011's then *record* setting volume (8M~ and change) was done for
that effort by NR took PTOI's PPS from approx 80c at the start of the month to 3.00 by EOM

by CONtrast .. NRs' recent *effort* (and set up) of November 2019 (new record setting volume month)
took PTOI from approx 035c to 11c .. which of course is why NR then focused effort against Nulixo specifically

NR works cycles of money .. making $ on the way and on the resets
back down .. this can work for weeks/months or years .. until it *CANT*

then NR brutalizes the stock

and why NR has such *angst* re: P2O/PTOI .. compressing X OTC target down to sub 1c
(again for most of the past many years .. PTOI has been held @ sub 6c) almost always
is successful in NR getting actual targets' shareholders to sell

so *extra effort* kicked in back in July 2010 .. it began the first of many *set ups*
that NR would inflict on P2O and her retail investors

then think about what happens when that doesn't work

for the most part .. my focus remains on what has come to pass since mid August 2013
a *clean slate* for NR so to speak .. re: PTOI (stock)

remember the 1 *cert* held out of the 450 total .. that 1 cert is the DTC (a CE)
the DTC holds every *share* traded on the open market via other CEs (colluding entities)
brokerage firms/insurance companies/banks .. any *entity* that trades *equities*

realize too what 450 works out to (avgs) for 125M~ (I/O) .. about 277,777 *shares* per
now we know that is *nonsense* because some actual P2O investors hold *respectively*
500k .. 750k .. 1.2M .. 1.5M .. 2M .. 2.5M .. 3M .. 3.3M .. and of course the CE (DTC) holds the
1 cert for every *NR entity* that holds equities ..

think about that .. er .. *imbalance* if X OTC target .. executes


so here is what *imo* has *changed* in the last 18 months .. give or take a month or two

for years various CEs (brokerage firms) loaned out (allowed NR to access for a $fee) ..
PTOI *shares* held in retail clients' cash accounts

now even tho' *various CE charters may say they don't allow for that* .. remember the adage
embedded for decades .. the OTC is fungible and no retail entity would ever know that
because the *more aware* brokerage firms/CEs .. would only be loaning out a % of the firms total held

so say for example .. one well known X CE/brokerage firm holds 16M PTOI *shares* in various retail accounts
software analysis reveals that for years only 1M of the 16M place GTCs to sell .. leaving 15M just sitting there
NRs' clients respective cash accounts

X brokerage isn't stupid .. they won't loan out (allow NR to access) PTOI for more than say 20%
of the 15M balance not set via GTCs (3M total *shares*) .. so this is done for years for a $fee ..
and this scheme works .. until something changes .. and various X brokerage firms (CEs) want the 20%
loan out *reduced* to 10%

now say the embedded NR entity having wiped their abusive slate clean with aromatics' flushed
out of P2O by EO 2014 .. (imo they didn't but for this example we'll say they did) .. went back to
their habit and systematically accumulated an abusive tally .. since 2015 .. so over the last 5 years or so ..
that abusive tally gets added to .. slowly/steadily .. even tho' PTOI saw *decreasing* volume YOY
from 2015 to 2016 to 2017 .. 2018 saw a slight volume increase over 2017 .. and of course we all know
what 2019's *volume* was (smidge under 24M~)

the volume done on PTOI over 4 years (2015 to 2018) comes in @ just under 70M
factor in 2019 and rounding down that volume (for simplicity's sake) the 5 year total = 92M


69,500,806 (2015/2016/2017/2018)
23,994,633 (2019)
--------------------
93,495,439 (2015 to 2019)



ironically at my last check with the TA .. PTOI's *float* (freely traded shares) is approx 92M
rounding up I/O .. 125M
restricted holds steady between 30M to 33M over the past few years ..

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=152392122

also a reminder of what the I/O has been held @ since 2015 .. from respective 10Ks' filed (2015 onward)


As of March 31, 2015, there were 120,244,157 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding.

As of April 14, 2016, there were 124,756,158 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding.

As of April 7, 2017, there were 124,756,158 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, $0.001 par value,
outstanding.

As of April 2, 2018, there were 124,756,158 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding.

As of June 3, 2019, there were 124,756,158 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding.


https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?type=&dateb=&owner=include&action=getcompany&CIK=0001381105

so back to NRs' ability to *access* from fellow Colluding Entities (various Brokerage firms)
PTOI *shares* .. which *previously* has never presented an issue to X brokerage firms ..
provided everything CONtinues in NRs' favor


first and foremost of course .. is keeping targets' PPS below X price point
this almost always ensures that company can't execute
and if they do .. NR tries to cut company off at the knees and CONtinue
to try and force *compliance* .. but without legit sells of significance .. that only adds to NRs' ongoing tally

so what came to pass at the EO 2018 to counter NR and seemingly gleaned by CEs ..
.. Canadian Patent issued to P2O
and perhaps more disturbing for NR .. is what came to pass in April of 2019 .. a private company's
first site/install (after years of iterations) now had a known value assigned to it .. more *telling* perhaps
is the backer of the state's green bonds .. was none other than GS (oh the ironies) themselves


and of course there was the *revealing* events of June & July 2019
from 1.29.19 to very early June 2019 .. PTOI (the stock) had volume maintenance
volume maintenance isn't done by *retail investors* .. so that alone piqued curiosity
but more telling was the cliff diving volume for the two months of June & July 2019
(the lowest and second lowest *volume* in 2019)


JUN 2019 ~ 491,063
JUL 2019 ~ 445,451



and then of course the appearance of a NR entity . *shortly* afterward .. i refer to as a surgical buyer
imo >> briefly showed .. Aug/Sept/Oct and the first week of Nov 2019

hmmm

at some point @ the EO 2019 .. CEs' (a few brokerage firms) bought a clue
i strongly suspect NRs' accessing of CEs' PTOI *shares* was addressed


*volume* always matters .. real/fake or a combo of ..

folks might remember that 1.29.19 .. PTOI *saw volume* not seen last since June 2017

it's also why when one sees a NR entity doing volume maintenance .. on a stock held mostly sub 3c in 2019
.. one has to ask the 640M $ ? .. who and why


perhaps more telling .. 2019 broke every *pattern* NR has displayed over prior (many) years on PTOI

and most telling to me .. is NRs' inability to do *volume* on PTOI recently unless it's washed or hidden

PTOI had just under 9M in volume in November's set up by NR ..

note the lack of follow on (btw in any other year .. 2015 to 2018 .. 1.3M or 1.4M monthly would be significant)


PTOI ~ NOV 2019 ~ 8,847,829
PTOI ~ DEC 2019 ~ 1,442,058
PTOI ~ JAN 2020 ~ 1,363,463



so presuming that CEs' (Brokerage firms) bought a clue .. and clamped *access* .. embedded NR
has a problem .. specific to a few realities ..


we all remember the last round of *volume* done on PTOI was November 2019 (4 days @ plus 1M per)
b4 that 1.29.19 (54% hidden) and b4 that 6/2017


11/20/2019 0.07 0.0701 0.0503 0.0623 1,227,466
11/15/2019 0.094 0.11 0.076 0.095 1,423,292
11/14/2019 0.071 0.109 0.0675 0.0749 1,574,854
11/13/2019 0.053 0.0704 0.053 0.07 1,208,504

01/29/2019 0.0113 0.08 0.0103 0.02 1,046,642

06/22/2017 0.0176 0.0202 0.0112 0.019 1,143,831



first of those *problems* NR faces .. is *volume maintenance* .. specifically towards the EO this month

currently PTOI 10/90 day avgs ..

Volume (10 day Average) 34,642
Volume (90 day Average) 155,273


and 2 months ago ~

Volume (10 day Average) 81,166
Volume (90 day Average) 146,549


second of those *problems* NR faces ..
is YOY %s remaining *green* on PTOI .. most of 2019 PTOI held *green* re: YOY %s

third of those *problems* NR faces .. and so obvious by EO December 2019
NR is literally stuck .. they really CANT run PTOI up because NR CANT
afford to lose control of that effort (over 800 remain re: this SMB)

NR is desperate for ask hits (far easier for them to work off of then filling legit bids) .. hence the CONstant
UC'ing (undercutting) on *ask* .. but many P2O investors .. provide bid support
having long ago figured out NRs' rigged patterns .. so the phrase .. hoisted by their own petard comes to mind

NR is literally *stuck* .. NR has to *show* volume .. NR has to *hold* ask side .. NR has to break *bid side*
and of course after a decade's efforts .. NR has to actually get *retail* to sell .. because if *access* to retails'
*shares* has indeed been clamped (cut off) what options does NR actually have left to *counter* with ..

harass Nulixo .. check
set up PTOI (stock) yet again .. check (only that fizzled on *volume* due to a PPS *range* of 075c)
ramp effort re: retail .. check

over the past weeks .. one *sell* was claimed (tho' to be clear no time stamp forwarded for proof)
it was what is referred to as a paint .. 666 done in the last minute to close PTOI *down*

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=153676562

666 is an interesting *trade* size done on PTOI over the past many years .. (333 x2) and (1000 - 666 = 334)
NR signals constantly on PTOI .. more so in 2019 and 2020 .. than in years previous .. the primary signals are 10/11/12

during the same time .. currently known P2O retail investors picked off (mostly via bid but not always)

JAN 2020 ~ 453,273/1,363,463 = 33.24%
https://otce.finra.org/otce/marketStatistics/monthlyShareVolume

FEB 2020 ~ (rough) 42,766/118,620 = 36.05%

that plus 30% is NRs' *problem* in a nutshell and it's why 2019 saw *hidden trade %s on PTOI* spike off the charts

any way it is sliced the next *round* .. will be revealing .. over the coming weeks .. *volume* and YOY are key
there is also the fact that the 10K is due to be filed (if filed on time .. sans NT .. some might find that also revealing)

and imo (as previously noted) with the 8K filed by P2O re: X buyers' feedstock avenues successfully processed
P2O (the company) becomes an instant and immediate buyout candidate .. which brings me full circle back to this


first unlike many OTC targets (OTC is totally fungible)
P2O's founder originally accessed non toxic capital
to fund something many of us still deem jaw dropping
.. table top to Flagship in mere years .. this is significant
(far more so today than even 6 years or so ago)



years ago .. i posted re: P2O/PTOI .. that which NR CANT kill off .. eventually gets *embraced*

note the embracing done in April 2019 .. by a previously serially selective equity destroyer .. oh the ironies

it's why it won't surprise me with P2O's 8Ks' filed .. what of the numerous options *available* .. come to pass

P2O has always had options .. which clearly .. many (not all) actual P2O investors' ascertained over the years

and ironically after years of abuse .. it may just be that various CEs' *clamps* re: PTOI *shares accessed*
unintentionally aids and abets P2O and her retail investors ..


it too would be ironic ..

lastly .. to be clear and answering a few queries .. imo the *surgical* buyer of 2019 .. picked off between 4M to
possibly 8M PTOI *shares* in 2019 ..

beyond one day in 2020 .. where cat and mouse play was observed ..
no signs so far in 2020 .. (reminder last time viewed specifically was the first week of November 2019
when NN blocked @ *ask* via a 10k size @ 0375c thru that Friday)

this *surgical buyer* .. may be connected to Nulixo .. it is equally possible there is zero correlation
and ironically if *awareness* exists .. surgical entity recognizes the asset of NRs' decade old embedded abuse
and will time *efforts* accordingly

never dull these days ..

as always .. best to all actual P2O investors


4kids


Hoping for success with Nulixo amid opposition

I think Steve Price never foresaw the battle going on between pro and con within P2O. Why should he update into this toxic garbage dump. There is a lot of money to be made in this emerging market as we have seen with the recent 260 million dollar investment and I would bet he has encountered strong opposition from those trying to malign their own agenda. He and his team know what they’re doing. I think he is better off to get his ducks in a row then let the world in on his successful enterprise. Also plastic waste is a nuisance of disgust on our beautiful planet and the world will applaud the riddance of it. Good luck to the believers! Hang in there!










































10/5/07 -- there are no coincidences here ...
oh and like many other longs .. not selling at this level --