InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 282
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/22/2019

Re: shajandr post# 269349

Wednesday, 12/04/2019 1:09:17 PM

Wednesday, December 04, 2019 1:09:17 PM

Post# of 346662
Would you take the yield sign down when the experts involved do not appear to know what a financial quarter is?

Tables from the annual submissions are cut and pasted irrespective of dates into quarterly reports, endlessly repeating non-relevant and not-current information. The latest quarterly update has transactions from 2017 in it!

The purpose of providing a quarterly update is lost to management and these glaring mistakes are hard for even a cursory review by OTC Markets to accept. The purpose of timely public disclosures of material events is lost completely.

Aside from the formatting, we know significant transactions and agreements have been made that are not reflected in the unaudited records that have been made available.

The 2018 audited report that was disclosed was not even SIGNED. That is a glaring mistake that will need to be rectified.

1st step formatting.
2nd step substance.
3rd step consistency.

We are barely at step 1.

We have two locations that were announced to be revenue streams by now and they do not even have signs up.