Thursday, October 17, 2019 4:19:48 PM
Compare the device at the start of this investment versus now; are they the same? There is a vastly more advanced device that is worth a lot more that has been developed by this company where millions have been spent on that developement. It was not a zero gain in value in each stage.
And so we are talking about the value. If it was worthless from the onset, then why was it worth more than 16 million back then. You can't have a regressive pricing if the value of the product is going up.
Now I don't give a damn at this point because I don't own it but I do believe that there is a force which brought it down to current price because it is worth vastly more. It is not a piece of junk.
All the money raised would have been spent on the device and would have added value and that should have been reflected in stock price.
Unitronix Corp. to Invest $3 Million in USA Unity Coin Project • UTRX • Oct 7, 2024 7:08 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Assays up to 5 oz/ton Gold, 1.5 oz/ton Platinum, 0.5 oz/ton Palladium, and 0.5 oz/ton Rhodium at Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Oct 4, 2024 9:15 AM
Basanite, Inc. Appoints Ali Manav as Interim Chief Executive Officer • BASA • Oct 3, 2024 9:15 AM
Integrated Ventures Announces Launch of MedWell Facilities, LLC and Lease Agreement with Giant Fitness Clubs • INTV • Oct 3, 2024 8:45 AM
Beyond the Horizon: Innovative Drug Combinations Offer New Hope for Alzheimer's and More • NVS • Oct 3, 2024 8:45 AM
SMX and FinGo Enter Into Collaboration Mandate to Develop a Joint 'Physical to Digital' Platform Service To Enhance Natural Rubber Industry's Ability to Report on Sustainable and Ethical Supply Chains • SMX • Oct 3, 2024 7:00 AM