Thursday, October 17, 2019 4:19:48 PM
Compare the device at the start of this investment versus now; are they the same? There is a vastly more advanced device that is worth a lot more that has been developed by this company where millions have been spent on that developement. It was not a zero gain in value in each stage.
And so we are talking about the value. If it was worthless from the onset, then why was it worth more than 16 million back then. You can't have a regressive pricing if the value of the product is going up.
Now I don't give a damn at this point because I don't own it but I do believe that there is a force which brought it down to current price because it is worth vastly more. It is not a piece of junk.
All the money raised would have been spent on the device and would have added value and that should have been reflected in stock price.
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM
ATWEC Announces Major Acquisition and Lays Out Strategic Growth Plans • ATWT • Jun 20, 2024 7:09 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc Announces Acquisition of Drago Knives, LLC • CAFI • Jun 18, 2024 8:45 AM
Hydromer Announces Attainment of ISO 13485 Certification • HYDI • Jun 17, 2024 9:22 AM