MRC, the products you list have not run an outcomes studies, haven't been proven to reduce CVD like V, many have high levels of impurities plus DHA, most are unstable and many have spoiled fish oil, fillers, and impurities and DHA, don't have the amounts of EPA they claim, are totally unregulated and currently under attack by the FDA, aren't approved for CVD treatment and failed to show any health benefits at all[ according to all the meta analysis you've previously cited as to why AMRN would fail} and have been removed in EU for lack of effectiveness after testing.. The cost to achieve the V's EPA levels with DS are nearly just as costly as V, to the consumer, but have been proven not to work. DS can not advertise the cardio benefit until proven and endorsed by FDA. Doctors won't write scripts for it and or suggest it over Vascepa once label expansion comes and formularies adjust tiering. Doctors that are currently doing that are ignorant fools and open to litigation by their patients and others for making false claims about DS being equal to V and prescribing it to their patients as a substitute for V. And you know this. Your DS BS won't make much of a dent in V sales much longer and may be banned for total ineffectiveness and false advertising. See what's happening to Lovaza? and you think your DS is better than ineffective Lovaza. What a joke. Amarin never claimed its just an EPA/AA ratio as its the MOA. That's your claim and you're not a scientist, doctor or involved with any studies of EPA. You just cherry pick shit to attack with your nonsense. Take all the OTC shit you want but you're wasting time here. Vascepa will be fine and you will be wrong AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! How well did all your do gooder, protect the people from big bad AMRN, pre reduceit warnings of failure go for you? Thats what I thought. But it's so nice of you to spend so much of your time, effort and money trying to protect the world from V/AMRN out of the pure goodness of your heart. All IMO.
