InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 42
Posts 42446
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: laranger post# 171467

Thursday, 11/16/2006 8:49:19 AM

Thursday, November 16, 2006 8:49:19 AM

Post# of 432775
ranger,
You wrote:
So, if I'm getting you doods correctly, Nokia must provide proof:

1. That EACH and everyone of the 195 patents are NOT ESSENTIAL. (God knows how they do this).


My comment:
I don't think Nok has to provide proof. That is for the trial. I think NOK will have to provide testimony how they came to the conclusion that the patents were not essentials. Whose expertise did they rely on to come to this conclusion? Or what method did they use? Or did they make an unfounded charge?

mo
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News