Limiting our settlement $$ expectation just because "the highest ever payout" was such and such is ill justified, I believe.
We need to remind ourselves that there has always been a new "highest ever" settlement in the history of court settlements and there will always be.
That is exactly why we see a LIST of "highest ever" and not just ONE "highest ever" payout case.
Clearly, UOIP has the capacity and the strength of a case to top that list as the NEW "highest ever" paid settlement in history until the next one comes around. IMO
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.