InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 619
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/14/2018

Re: abc1212 post# 217934

Wednesday, 03/13/2019 1:15:39 AM

Wednesday, March 13, 2019 1:15:39 AM

Post# of 691524
My perspective on Wick’s interview seems to be somewhat of a minority opinion based on past posts I’ve read (they may have been mostly over at the wolf’s den), though I appreciate the additional info on his potential COIs and competing vaccine. They don’t seem to have affected his comments in the interview, IMO.

It’s kind of a big nothing burger, as the old saying goes.

I believe he felt discomfort discussing trial results that are still blinded (therefore not ready for analysis) and published in a less than stellar journal (he really winces here or maybe it was indigestion), apparently without peer-review. For a scientist, this is a reasonable and, and I believe, correct perspective. Thus, he limited himself to what he could say without guess work, connecting dots and filling in blanks. It’s safe, it’s feasible — show us the unblinded data already!

I don’t hold this particular interview against him, though I suppose he could have diplomatically bowed out.

Stupp and Fine, on the other hand, when interviewed on the same topic, revealed themselves to be big...
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News